November 17, 2008

food insecurity

Filed under:, , , , — Chris @ 12:16 pm

Via the CBPP, news that food insecurity is up again this year — even before this latest economic implosion:

Even before the current economic downturn, some 13 million households, containing 36.2 million people, lacked access to adequate food at some point in 2007 because they didn’t have enough money for groceries, according to today’s release. These figures are a slight increase over the findings for 2006, but given the dramatic weakening of the economy in recent months, the number of “food insecure” households has likely grown considerably in 2008.

Food stamp caseloads — an indicator of those struggling to afford a basic diet — grew by nearly 2 million people between January and August 2008 (the most recent month for which we have data). The economic downturn also has coincided with a sharp increase in food prices, both of which have undoubtedly exacerbated hardship for many low-income families.

None of this data accounts for homeless individuals or families, either.

August 18, 2008

nuts

Filed under:, , — Chris @ 8:48 pm

Mixed nuts in order of tastiness:
(An authoritative, painstakingly-researched list that is full of facts)

  • Pecans — unique for their inability to be consumed by themselves. Too overpowering. They have to be in mixed nuts to maximize relative deliciousness.
  • Cashews
  • Brazil Nuts — these are delicious and full of selenium, which is good for your prostate. But they are knocked down a few notches, because they used to be called “nigger toes”, and that’s just so weird and wrong. Also, Brazil is on the same continent as Venezeuela, which is run by a crazed brutal dictator (mental note: fact-check this), and we shouldn’t support terrorisms.
  • Almonds
  • Peanuts — although perhaps my favorite nut, they share the opposite property of pecans, wherein the combination with other nuts obliterates their tastiness.
  • Filberts/Hazelnuts (You should throw these away, or at people you don’t like) *

* Filberts are not actually a nut at all. They are actually the testicles of a lower-level shit demon, and they taste about how that sounds. God made a bet with the devil when the devil claimed that humans would eat anything. God lost, obviously, but we’ve been eating them ever since.

March 5, 2008

on matters of steak

Filed under:, , , , , , — Chris @ 12:43 pm

So, I’ve been eating a lot of steak lately. One of the benefits of my bachelordom is that I can have bourbon and steak for dinner and not get yelled at. So, people love to grill steak, and for good reason. It’s tasty. Charcoal flavor is nice. But being the fancy-lad downtown-living metrosexual that I am, I don’t exactly have the requisite equipment to grill a steak — namely, a patio. Or a grill. So, I pan-fry. The very idea used to disgust me, but I’ve come ’round to the pan-fried steak. And I’ve mastered the art of it, if I do say so myself. The picture at right demonstrates my early on in my attempts to pan-fry. I just slapped it in the pan and hoped for the best. The fresh, pretty red color on black makes for a nice picture, but not a very good meal. More on that below.

This is not a complicated process, but it works for me, and it’s fairly tailored to my preferences. I like steak very rare, but I’ve never been a big fan of cold meat. I like my steak as rare as possible while still warm in the middle, basically. (This depends on the quality of the meat, though — I’m not as picky about this with filet mignon, for example.) So, to accomplish this, I do a few things. First, regarding meat selection. My preference is for a thick cut, an inch to an inch and a half. I usually target 16oz. steaks, as this is more than enough for me when I’m starving, and a decent size for two people. Preferrably strip or ribeye. This process works for either. Typically, I let the meat come down to room temperature on the counter, while I busy myself with other important things, such as tweezing my eyebrows.

Once the meat reaches room temp (or when I get too hungry to wait any longer), I cut the meat in half, salt/pepper it liberally and put it in a nonstick baking pan with sides. Preheat the oven to around 275 degrees and stick it in. I have no specific time that I keep the meat in the oven, and it largely depends on the thickness and size of the steak. The idea is basically to bring the meat up to serving temperature throughout, and cook the outside a bit. I basically eye-ball it and rely on smell — with a ribeye, my kitchen will start to smell like prime rib when it’s more or less there. This takes some experience to get right. Too long and you run the risk of overcooking it, or at least drying it out. So, it may take some experimentation. It’s probably the hardest part — as much as eating steak every night while you learn can be described as “hard”.

At this point, I get out my one, my only, my constant — my true love. My skillet. It’s time to sear the meat. Bring the skillet to a fairly high temperature as high as it will go. It will be scary. You’ll be afraid that your smoke alarm will go off, or that you’ll actually burn down your house. If you’re not afraid of this, it’s not hot enough. Dump butter in, and wait for the water content to boil off and the pan to start smoking. The only thing we’re doing here is searing the meat. It’s already cooked to our satisfaction. The goal here is two-fold: general browning, and the all-important Maillard Reaction. This is a complex reaction that involves chemicals and … stuff — specifically amino acids and sugar. The result is that elusive Umami — aka “the taste that everyone forgets about”. This reaction doesn’t happen at all without sugar, though, so that’s why the butter (lactose) is important. It also requires high temperature and low moisture levels, so make sure to pat the meat dry before searing. So anyways, sear the meat on all sides — I like to use tongs to allow for better management of the meat, and so I can sear the meat on the sides, as well. Once seared to your satisfaction, remove it from the heat, set aside and let it cool. Meat will continue to cook after heat is removed, of course, so make sure you let it stand for a while and also take this into account while you’re searing. While it’s cooling, you can prepare your other sides, or whatever. I’ve read some articles in Cook’s Illustrated that recommend finishing it in the oven, but I haven’t found that to be necessary.

It’s tough to get good results by just slapping cold meat in a pan (as I had previously) — if the skillet is too hot, you get seared meat but ice-cold inside. Conversely, if it’s too cold, it takes approximately forever to cook, and the meat gets dried out (and probably burned rather than browned, on the outside.). It’s a lose-lose situation. The result with this technique (when done right) is a nicely seared outside, with that savory bit of buttery brown crust we all love so much, and nicely warmed, moist, rare meat on the inside.

Enjoy!

June 7, 2007

Huitlacoche

Filed under:, , , , , — Chris @ 11:04 pm

Does anyone know where to get this stuff in Nashville? I haven’t really looked, but why look around when I can ask the Internet?

I have been wanting to try it for a while, especially now that I ran across this recipe for squash-blossom/huitlacoche quesadillas:

Chihuahua cheese
Flour tortillas
1 clove garlic
1 tablespoon corn oil or other oil
Squash blossoms
1 can huitlachoche

I have to try that..

June 5, 2007

crud

Filed under:, — Chris @ 7:24 pm

Guys, I got so worked up writing that that last post that I overcooked my loin.

IF you know what I mean:

Loin

Ah well, I guess that’s the price for actually writing again.

June 24, 2006

when disaster strikes

Filed under:, , , — Chris @ 6:29 pm

Hi, I’m Chris. You may remember me from such blogs as .. this one.

My main fileserver drive died. I’ll spare you the nerdy details, but my awesome setup saved me a lot of trouble but it also took almost 18 hours. I am not sure if I really won out on that one.

Amanda and I met some friends at Mothership BBQ this afternoon, and saw a bunch of other bloggers, including Sarcastro, who was Live-blogging the affair.

I was pretty impressed by the food. You guys know me, and you all know I’m a dick. If it sucked, I’d say so, but the hype isn’t just blogger-circle-jerking. It’s pretty good BBQ. I had the pulled pork plate and Amanda had the ribs. The pork was good but I shoulda got the ribs. They were pretty amazing.

February 28, 2006

chicken

Filed under:, , , , — Chris @ 12:32 am

Well, this makes me feel good. Amanda and I had some just roast chicken for dinner tonight and it was just sliiightly undercooked, but hey, what’s the worry, right?

Well, now of course I see that the USDA has announced that chicken salmonella rates are up nearly 80 percent.

That’s a lot of percents.

February 20, 2006

food stamp strings

Filed under:, , , — Chris @ 9:20 pm

Via US Food Policy, I see that Michelle Holmes wants to attach some strings to the use of food stamps to limit their purchase of unhealthy food.

Is this ethical? What happens when the authorities are largely wrong about what might be causing an obesity crisis (for example, oh, I don’t know, let’s just say, hypothetically, the last 50 years of strict low-fat policy)?

What happens when someone disagrees with our health policy? Are they to be left their own devices to find food? This is a dangerous idea. Food policy should gravitate towards education, not mandate. People aren’t going to eat healthy by force — they need understand why they should be making an effort to be healthy, but they need to decide on their own terms what “healthy” means.

Also, the larger point being ignored here is that “food stamps are still buying soda pop, potato chips and deep-fried frozen dinners” not because people are stupid or ignorant. But rather, newsflash, junk food is infinitely cheaper than healthy food. So here’s a different idea: use food stamp policy to make healthy food cheaper. I am not really a policy/administrative wonk enough to provide a useful suggestion as to how to go about this. Suggestions?

February 19, 2006

i heart taquerias

Filed under:, , , — Chris @ 3:51 pm

I [heart] taquerias. Well, actually, I’ve never been to one. But I’d like to retain the option.

This is just a reminder that Ordinance No. BL2005-860 is up for a second reading at the metro council meeting on Tuesday. The ordinance aims to impose some rather draconian restrictions on “temporary food establishments”. Their justification is that the health violations by these establishments are somehow egregious and need to be handled differently. Brittney did some great work a few months ago, demonstrating that this is a load of bullocks. These establishments are covered under health regulations like any other restaurant, and they’ll be consequently shut down if violations are found. It’s hard to see this attempt to legislate them out of existence as anything but pandering to their competition (established restaurants) in the area.

The Scene also had a good article about this last November.

Talk to your councilperson and encourage them to oppose this nonsense.

February 9, 2006

hot kabobs

Filed under:, , , — Chris @ 10:36 pm

On a whim, after reading the Scene’s review, Amanda and I went to Hot Kabobs tonight.

It was great, that’s really all I have to say — cheap as hell, good food, friendly service, and a really cozy little restaurant. We’ll definitely be back. I had a sirloin kabab, and it was great, though I sorta wish I had gone for khoresht, which is what Amanda had, of a split-pea variety. It was really tasty. Next time.

Amanda noted tonight that we really have no reason to go to some stupid chain restaurant ever again — Nashville is increasingly blessed with awesome locally-owned restaurants that are multitudes better and cheaper to boot.

Next Page »