February 18, 2004

grr

Filed under: — Chris @ 5:45 pm

I just noticed this in my HTTP access logs:

172.144.61.107 - - [18/Feb/2004:17:31:39 -0600] “HEAD / HTTP/1.1″ 200 0 “http://blog.johnkerry.com” “StarProse Referrer Advertising System 2004″

What does it mean? It means the webmasters of blog.johnkerry.com have hired a company or used a program themselves to spam the referrer logs of websites to advertise their site. Referrer-log spamming is basically when someone forges the HTTP_REFERRER header. This header is normally used to indicate the site that ‘referred” you to your webserver. It’s arbitrary, however, and can be forged.

The idea, believe it or not, is that if you spam the site with enough forged referrers, if that website is running a stats-gathering tool, (like mine), the URL will show up on the list of “top referrers”.

I guarantee you, though, Kerry’s blog will receive no placement on my stats page. I’d provide free advertising if asked politely, but if they want it now, they can pay me.

This is the text of the e-mail I sent to info@johnkerry.com as well as webmaster@johnkerry.com:

Hi.

I just observed this entry in my webserver’s log:

172.144.61.107 - - [18/Feb/2004:17:31:39 -0600] “HEAD / HTTP/1.1″ 200 0
“http://blog.johnkerry.com” “StarProse Referrer Advertising System 2004″

This is not cool. Referrer-log spamming is spamming. It’s unsolicited
and impolite.

I am a supporter of Kerry (or any Democrat), incidentally, but let me
tell you that this is NOT the way to win votes. All you are going to do
is piss people off. I’m a good example.

My recommendation is that you discontinue your agreement with “StarProse
Referrer Advertising System 2004″, AKA “Referrer-log spammers”, and
stick with solicited advertising.

Thank you,

–Chris

UPDATE: I no longer believe that Kerry’s campaign is responsible for this. See here for details.

RSS feed | Trackback URI

25 Comments »

Comment by Manish
2004-02-19 01:14:57

Chris,

Running the IP Address through arin.net notes that it belongs to AOL. My guess is that the Kerry campaign probably has nothing to do with this and its just someone doing it on their own. I would contact AOL (abuse@aol.com) and go from there.

Manish

 
Trackback by Say Uncle
2004-02-19 08:48:57

The latest Kerry scandal

John Kerry’s camp is apparently guilty of referral log spamming. I continue to not like this guy….

 
Comment by Chris Wage
2004-02-19 09:30:27


My guess is that the Kerry campaign probably has nothing to do with this and its just someone doing it on their own.

While I have no doubt that John Kerry himself and his campaign organizers didn’t get together to spam me, it’s obvious that someone involved with the site did.

I understand that it’s very likely some retard intern on the campaign that thought it was a good idea, but johnkerry.com should still be held responsible so that they find him, and make him stop.

It’s not like it’s some spammer maliciously spamming me with their site. Spammers are a dirty bunch, but even they are not so big on advertising other people’s sites, in my experience.

 
Comment by Wade
2004-02-22 14:50:40

There is another possibility, of course - someone could be “Joe Jobbing” the campaign. Trying to set up the Kerry campaign to LOOK like spammers.

I’m not sure which one I believe - I’ve written to to info@ and webmaster@ too asking the question, but haven’t heard anything back. I’d say both possibilities are equally likely at this point. In digging through my logs a bit more, I’ve found other StarProse referral spam, all from Democratic candidates. When campaigns as diverse as Kerry, Edwards, and Al Sharpton are showing up with the same software and the same general layout, it raises my suspicions a bit more for the Joe-Job.

 
Comment by Chris Wage
2004-02-22 14:59:12

Interesting.. I haven’t seen it from anyone else. It wouldn’t surprise me if you were right, though.

 
Trackback by HobbsOnline
2004-02-23 06:54:03

John Kerry, Spammer

Chris Wage finds evidence that John Kerry’s presidential campaign may be engaging in a form of spamming….

 
Comment by Inga
2005-03-07 17:08:42

Chris,

Thanks for your rudeness. I didn’t realize who was running this web site. You are definitley not a participant in free speech. I was defending what I know.

Neo-Nazi shithead, you called me!! I don’t think so. I am a Jew, living in Germany.

You are the ignorant one!

Thanks.

 
Comment by Johan
2005-03-08 21:57:40

I am closing the comments on this thread because the conversation is no longer productive (if it ever was). I am generally not the type to stifle debate, but frankly, I’m tired of getting e-mail about the most recent inflammatory, ignorant and racist comment and its exasperated response.

And since this is my website, I get the luxury of having the last word.

I’d recommend that Johan go and read the wikipedia entry on Race again, since he clearly has no idea what it is (hint: a social construct).

I’d advise both Inga and Johan to either re-evaluate their racist philosophies or at least start trying not to sound like such creepy Neo-Nazi shitheads.

Good day!

Chris:

I just wanted to say that I completely disagree with everything you just said.

(If anyone would like to contact me, and discuss this, I have set up an account at:

johan_kalb@yahoo.com)

 
Comment by Inga
2005-03-09 10:54:14

Chris is obviously wanting to shut the door and ignore. I get the sense that Chris is racist himself. (anyone is capable of being a racist). His views are totally one-sided.

Your assumption Chris was extremely ignorant.

Inga

 
Comment by Erik
2005-03-15 07:26:00

Chris, why did you close the debate?? I’ll agree that there were some extreme views, but I would have liked to answer some of the questions that f.ex. Inga asked me. A debate without any controversy makes no sense, political correcness suffocates free speech. Anyone interested in contact may write to erikgj@sol.dk

 
Comment by Marc
2005-03-18 11:40:55

I’ve had a chance to read the site re: Black/White issues, and I would say that it’s all about Chris/Jessica. No freedom of speech there man!!

 
Comment by Inga
2005-03-21 11:13:12

Well Chris you have not answered. Very very rude and ignorant indeed. I guess you think you are the chief, closing the door on free speech. I guess this was an American experience. Once again, the European view of America is correct.

I have been staying in Canada for a few months, and I must say that it is the most wonderful country in the world. Now I must return to Germany, and continue my good life. I want to add that there is far more freedom of speech in Germany than America.

Have a good life! Maybe what you called me should apply to yourself, what do you think?

From a Jew (thanks for calling me a Neo-Nazi Shithead - obiviously you don’t know the meaning of Nazi

 
Comment by Marc
2005-03-23 16:29:38

Hey Man,

This guy Chris doesn’t have the guts to open the door.

 
Comment by Amanda
2005-03-25 10:37:24

Since when is a blog a public forum protected by free speech?

 
Comment by Marc
2005-03-25 14:26:11

Amanda,

Please clarify.

 
Comment by Johan
2005-03-26 18:27:15

I’d advise both Inga and Johan to either re-evaluate their racist philosophies or at least start trying not to sound like such creepy Neo-Nazi shitheads.

( Since you are an authority on things that sound “creepy”…)

The idea was mentioned in the discussion that all of authentic history ( and science) is nothing but a big conspiracy against blacks.

In what ways could that be “creepy”?

 
Comment by Marc
2005-03-27 18:17:14

Chris,

Why don’t you reopen the forum? You don’t like people speaking honestly man?

 
Comment by Johan
2005-03-30 21:46:38

I’d recommend that Johan go and read the wikipedia entry on Race again, since he clearly has no idea what it is (hint: a social construct).

Chris:

Wikipedia acknowledges that there is disagreement about the definition of race, and does not pretend to have the whole truth.

It is also editable.

…which means it cannot be used as some sort of canonical reference.

Of course, there is no such thing as holy canon in science - else people wouldn’t need updated textbooks, reflecting new studies such as this (click here).

 
Comment by Marc
2005-04-05 15:50:32

Absolutely Johan,

Race is definitely genetic. I’d recommend that Chris the man read about Race. He’s a man of few words.

He’s definitely not a believer in free speech. No guts man. He hasn’t got the courage to get into a good discussion.

If we were to close that door on any discussions involving the KKK or Hitler, we’d be in huge trouble. Things are better discussed in the open.

See ya man,

 
Comment by Johan
2005-04-09 17:50:07

Marc:

The discussion was about Beethoven’s race.

It was not about the KKK or Hitler.

But the Afrocentrists kept trying to control the discussion with their racist views.

They didn’t seem to care that there was a European historian present, who could have answered questions about Beethoven.

When they didn’t succeed in manipulating the discussion, they tried intimidation and accusation.

That didn’t work either (it backfired. Apparently, they are used to people in America just giving in to them, over such behavior).

So they apparently emailed Chris… who got out of trouble with their Excellencies by closing the discussion, and then comparing Inga and myself to “Neo-Nazis” (which perhaps doesn’t deserve comment).

It is interesting, how politics won’t work, without fear.

Science, of course, has no use for it.

“Nothing is to be feared, only to be understood”.

–Marie Currie

“All fear is bad”

–Bertrand Russel

 
Comment by Marc
2005-04-11 17:38:59

Whoa!!!!! Man, this Chris dude is a racist!! I read through the articles re: Beethoven. Where does he get off man, calling people Neo Nazi SH–heads! You are correct Johan, the comments on that site are full of Afrocentrists!!!

I think he owed someone an apology, and he wasn’t given it man!! Too bad for him.

 
Comment by Johan
2005-04-14 21:43:06

I can’t take Chris seriously.

Where were his abilities at discovering “inflammatory, ignorant and racist comment”, when Afrocentrists were making accusations against “whites” (e.g. history being a lie invented by whites, whites guilty of stealing “black inventions”, etc.), throughout the discussion?

 
Comment by Marc
2005-04-15 11:23:49

He sees our comments man, but has no backbone. The reality is that he’s IGNORANT!!

To step into a debate and throw his weight around like he’s the BIG MAN. Some people that were on that site, couldn’t back up anything that they said. They were really pathetic man, with the statments about history being invented by whites, and stealing black inventions. OH PLEEEASE!!!

He should open up the site once again, and stay out of the debate unless he’s got something useful to contribute.

See ya man,

 
Comment by Johan
2005-04-19 22:20:43

What Chris did was fine.

There were Europeans present in the discussion. One of them was a historian.

Notice the conduct of the Americans - especially the Afrocentrists - in the discussion. They aren’t even prepared to ask a single question, but were lecturing Europeans about European history.

…and freely accusing people of being Nazis, etc. - as if that is normal.

Not to mention the lies about black people having naturally straight hair, etc.

Chris maligned people for mentioning the existance of race - after starting a discussion about Beethoven’s race.

…and looked the other way, when the Afrocentrists did the same.

The Afrocentrists were accountable to no one (with Chris’ blessings) - but everyone was supposed to be accountable to them.

Europeans who saw the discussion, learned something.

I think that was fine.

 
Comment by Marc
2005-04-26 09:53:14

Hey Johan,

I read over that other site, and I didn’t see this the first time that there was apparently a Schubert descendent on site. Like get real MAN! That group of WHATEVER were total liars. Schubert never had any children himself.

WOW! What a load of you know what man!! TOTALLY AFROCENTRIC MAN!!

 
Name
E-mail
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Please enter 'confront' without the quotes.