July 28, 2008

hazel-eyed man opines

Filed under:, , , , , , — Chris @ 9:49 am

For the purposes of sparing my twitter followers that don't care, relocating discussion here. So far:

cwage: ok this story is awesome: http://www.wsmv.com/news/17008504/detail.html
cwage: why was it important to the story that he was homeless, though.. sounds to me like his defining characteristics were "drunk" + "crazy"
pwnicholson: @cwage I agree the story probably emphasized his homelessness, but it is normal practice to say "John Smith of Antioch" so it fits to me.
cwage: @pwnicholson "John Smith of Antioch" is an identity. "homeless man" is not
pwnicholson: @cwage Their local headline section: #1 is "Clarksville man" #3 is "Homeless man". Not saying there isn't bias, just not sure this is it

I left a comment on the story as well. This is not a new argument -- institutional bias in media coverage does exist. Witness the age-old argument of how often you see "A black youth" versus "A white youth", etc. In a news story, ideally you'd identify characteristics that are either relevant to the story or serve as a general cue for the subject's identity or tie in why it's even being reported. "John Smith of Antioch" == an identity. "Clarksville man" == "oh, he was from Clarksville, which is near here. that's why WSMV is reporting it". "homeless man" is not an identity, nor was it relevant to the fact that he got drunk and stole a trolley. "Drunk man", yes. "Crazy dude", yes.

Anyways, wanted to spare the twitterers the discussion. Feel free to continue arguing below! Or not.

July 27, 2008

warning: creep with camera!

Filed under:, , , , , , — Chris @ 8:26 pm

So, a few discussions this weekend got my gears turning: one, a conversation with a friend about a picture of a pretty girl, and a weird/creepy experience newscoma had with some pictures on flickr.

The former revolved around a great picture of a very pretty girl taken by my friend Karen (who is a great photographer, check out her stuff). I just mentioned how I think that picture is funny because it represents to me how much the photographer impacts the portrait being taken as much as the subject. (For more on this subject, read this very interesting post over on the online photographer.) That is, I have a feeling that this picture, taken by Karen, who is, herself, a very pretty, friendly and approachable woman (who may or may not know the subject, I don't know) would have turned out much differently had it been taken by me, a .. dude she doesn't know. Probably less relaxed, more awkward, and more guarded. Possibly a "why the fuck are you taking my picture" expression. This is what I like to call the "creep with cam" (CwC) effect.

I mean, those of you that know me know that I'm not a creep. Those of you that REALLY know me know that I sorta am. But, those of you that really REALLY know me, know that, deep down, I'm not. But the creep-with-cam stereotype exists for a reason. They're out there -- oh man are they ever out there. You know the type. The sex-deprived nerd that long ago, at the first viewing of a porno mag, realized the potential of a camera as an avenue into the world of Real Actual Naked Women. They are not always such a harmful bunch, usually just the lovable but preverted socially dysfunctional nerd type. But they can get weird.

Anyways, I don't know that I had a larger point here, except that the extreme CwCs sorta ruin it for the rest of us. Being a Standard Issue White Male, I am constantly racked with self-consciousness when I am out taking pictures of anything that can be misconstrued as Creepy. There's a public fountain near here that is basically on any given summer night a bonanza of families with kids playing in the water.. But, you know, I have my doubts about taking random candids of random girls -- this goes double for someone's kids. You could ask permission, but that sorta ruins the whole "candid" thing. I even felt a little weird taking my camera to roller derby... I wasn't, you know, thinking . o O ( GIRLS!! ), I was thinking . o O ( SUBJECTS!! ).. (okay, I was thinking girls, but not insofar as photography goes).

And then there are people who post pics to flickr of, you know, their 8 year old niece or whatever to flickr and having to subsequently take it down when they realize that some fucktard found it sexually stimulating.. I have this awesome picture of my friend Vernon's daughter and her friend richard at a swimming pool that I photoshopped (well, GIMPed) to make them wearing superhero costumes. It's fucking awesome. But I've never posted it, because I had doubts about even that. Which is just a damn shame.

Creepy dudes: ruining it for the rest of us.

July 25, 2008

p365 part deaux

Filed under:, , , , — Chris @ 3:49 am

I am doing Project365 again, though less obsessively this time. But I've gotten in the habit of taking pictures every day so much that it's not really that big of a deal. But I did miss the discipline in it, so what the hell, doin it again.

UPDATE: Now with non-broken links!

Day 1: Skyline Day 2: Choose Life Day 3: Chair Day 4: Green crap Day 5: Menu Day 6: V Day 7: Brick window thatway 4 2 chair Ginkgo is a prehistoric tree Encore lamp rosaparks trains walls flower canyon One Small Step for Bugkind Fountains Drink's eye view Roller Derby ennui Wasp vines

OPP (Other People’s Photos)

Filed under:, , , — Chris @ 1:20 am

My flickr favorites are awesome, you should check them out.

July 24, 2008

twitter

Filed under:, , — Chris @ 9:08 pm

Some quick thoughts about twitter I've been meaning to jot down:

  • The solution to twitter's problems will not be twitter. This is not a prediction made because I bear ill will towards twitter -- they had a cool idea and ran with it. It's because the problem with twitter is that it's a service that requires a distributed server/client base and a messaging protocol, and instead they built it on the web using a centralized infrastructure. It has nothing to do with how they built it, or the technology they chose. It's not because they used Ruby on Rails instead of symfony. The successor to twitter will be something built with XMPP or something similar -- a messaging protocol that is actually designed to be doing what twitter aims for.
  • Twitter is probably the largest working example of a web of trust. I don't mean this in the traditional cryptographic sense, but rather in the sense of regular personal trust. Already, via twitter, I've been introduced to a wealth of people that I'd normally not only have no reason to be talking to, but that also would have no reason to believe I wasn't just another freak on the Internet (which of course I am, but don't tell anyone). By virtue of a simple click to see who's "following" someone, you get the instant verification that "oh, this person is good people." It's pretty cool.
  • How I explain twitter to people: it's a chatroom on the web where you're gagging/ignoring everyone in the world by default.

July 22, 2008

humpday hammering

Filed under:, , — Chris @ 9:25 pm

So, I let loose that I had restocked my bar tonight, and it was suggested that people come over tomorrow and "help" me enjoy it. So be it! If you feel like swinging by after work tomorrow, feel free. Come on, come all. I promise not to make you watch Dr. Who. Well, unless you ask. Or mention it. Or I mention it, or am reminded of it.

150 2nd Ave S., #305, Nashville, TN 37201

Call me if you get lost. 615-294-4128. Bring me a replacement bottle of something. I don't have a lot of mixers, or any ice. Hint hint.

July 14, 2008

Question of the Day

Filed under:, , , — Chris @ 4:11 pm

I just saw this fly by in my logs:

75.187.103.203 - - [14/Jul/2008:15:52:38 -0500] "GET /2005/11/06/blue-balls/ HTT
P/1.1" 200 10033 "http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&c
hannel=s&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=M7U&q=%22blue+balls+cause+rape%22
&btnG=Search" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.15) Geck
o/20080623 Firefox/2.0.0.15"

In layman's term, someone searched for "blue balls cause rape" and arrived at my blog. I hate to see an inquiry go unanswered. So, the question for today, kids, is: does blue balls cause rape?

Short Answer: No.

Long Answer: No, you sick, sad little fuck.

I hope this has been educational.

July 12, 2008

$2 panhandler portraiture

Filed under:, , , — Chris @ 2:39 pm

I've opined about homeless and street photography before, so I'll merely pose this as a question:

Does focusing on panhandlers and paying them $2 for a picture make it better or worse?

I've got mixed feelings, but there's something vaguely unsettling about it to me.