April 10, 2008

twitter and XMPP

Filed under:, , , — Chris @ 10:41 am

A chain of thought I had this morning:

  • Twitter is fun and (tentatively) tremendously useful, albeit difficult to explain
  • Twitter is a centralized proprietary service, and thus prone to issues of scaling (outages), and privacy.
  • Twitter is not magic technology --XMPP and SMS gateways could basically do everything it does now.
  • That's nice and all, but Twitter has the user-base.
  • XMPP has a track record of being Really Cool Technology that languishes in obscurity due to its lack of user-friendly implementations and wide user-base adoption.
  • Google saved XMPP from a similar languishing death in the world of Instant Messaging by adopting this open standard as the basis for Google Talk.
  • Conclusion: Google needs to re-factor Google Talk to be/add a twitter-alike service.

Maybe?

RSS feed

2 Comments »

Comment by Cal Evans
2008-04-10 10:56:57

"That’s nice and all, but Twitter has the user-base."
...and therin lies the rub. There are other system out there like twitter and more feature-rich, but twitter wins because twitter has the users.

=C=

Comment by Chris
2008-04-10 11:05:56

If only there were some company with pockets deep enough to build something better and buy Twitter. :)

 
 
Name
E-mail
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Please enter 'confront' without the quotes.