<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: muslim reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chris.quietlife.net/2006/03/15/muslim-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chris.quietlife.net/2006/03/15/muslim-reform/</link>
	<description>What we honor as prudence in our elders is simply panic in action.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: t. rev</title>
		<link>http://chris.quietlife.net/2006/03/15/muslim-reform/#comment-50673</link>
		<dc:creator>t. rev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.quietlife.net/2006/03/15/muslim-reform/#comment-50673</guid>
		<description>Perhaps we can compromise on weak &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; obnoxious?

Lounsbury seems polite enough, considering.  Kind of Christopher Hitchensish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps we can compromise on weak <em>and</em> obnoxious?</p>
<p>Lounsbury seems polite enough, considering.  Kind of Christopher Hitchensish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eerie</title>
		<link>http://chris.quietlife.net/2006/03/15/muslim-reform/#comment-50610</link>
		<dc:creator>eerie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 19:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.quietlife.net/2006/03/15/muslim-reform/#comment-50610</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I’ve reread your original entry several times, and I just don’t see much misconception-exposure there&lt;/i&gt;

Not there. Here. And on every other blog where the entry was cited and commented on positively or negatively. What the entry did was get people talking, and by talking they exposed their misconceptions, prejudices, etc. Go see my co-author &lt;a href="http://lounsbury.aqoul.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Lounsbury's&lt;/a&gt; debate at &lt;a href="http://www.reason.com/hitandrun/2006/03/speaking_truth.shtml#comments" rel="nofollow"&gt;Reason.com&lt;/a&gt;. He's far less polite.

And the entry was obnoxious, not weak. Try not to take it so seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I’ve reread your original entry several times, and I just don’t see much misconception-exposure there</i></p>
<p>Not there. Here. And on every other blog where the entry was cited and commented on positively or negatively. What the entry did was get people talking, and by talking they exposed their misconceptions, prejudices, etc. Go see my co-author <a href="http://lounsbury.aqoul.com" rel="nofollow">Lounsbury&#8217;s</a> debate at <a href="http://www.reason.com/hitandrun/2006/03/speaking_truth.shtml#comments" rel="nofollow">Reason.com</a>. He&#8217;s far less polite.</p>
<p>And the entry was obnoxious, not weak. Try not to take it so seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t. rev</title>
		<link>http://chris.quietlife.net/2006/03/15/muslim-reform/#comment-50426</link>
		<dc:creator>t. rev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 19:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.quietlife.net/2006/03/15/muslim-reform/#comment-50426</guid>
		<description>I've reread your original entry several times, and I just don't see much misconception-exposure there.  Deconstructing a technique is not the same thing as refuting it.

I'm sympathetic to what I perceive your goals to be, and I respect the effort you're putting into this.  I still think the post is weak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve reread your original entry several times, and I just don&#8217;t see much misconception-exposure there.  Deconstructing a technique is not the same thing as refuting it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sympathetic to what I perceive your goals to be, and I respect the effort you&#8217;re putting into this.  I still think the post is weak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eerie</title>
		<link>http://chris.quietlife.net/2006/03/15/muslim-reform/#comment-50345</link>
		<dc:creator>eerie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.quietlife.net/2006/03/15/muslim-reform/#comment-50345</guid>
		<description>Except they're not bothering to clear up the misconceptions they create. My entry merely exposed the misconceptions held by the vast majority of Westerners. We've been commenting like this on a ton of blogs, because it's important that people understand that things are a bit more complex than Wafa's or Irshad's simplistic criticism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except they&#8217;re not bothering to clear up the misconceptions they create. My entry merely exposed the misconceptions held by the vast majority of Westerners. We&#8217;ve been commenting like this on a ton of blogs, because it&#8217;s important that people understand that things are a bit more complex than Wafa&#8217;s or Irshad&#8217;s simplistic criticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t. rev</title>
		<link>http://chris.quietlife.net/2006/03/15/muslim-reform/#comment-50306</link>
		<dc:creator>t. rev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 18:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.quietlife.net/2006/03/15/muslim-reform/#comment-50306</guid>
		<description>That's what I'm saying.  Say something flippant (or inflammatory, or both) to get people's attention, in hopes of pulling them in for the more thoughtful work.  It's a valid strategy...but it seems uncomfortably similar to what you're criticizing Sultan and Manji for.  It worked for them, now it's working for you.  Funny old world, innit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what I&#8217;m saying.  Say something flippant (or inflammatory, or both) to get people&#8217;s attention, in hopes of pulling them in for the more thoughtful work.  It&#8217;s a valid strategy&#8230;but it seems uncomfortably similar to what you&#8217;re criticizing Sultan and Manji for.  It worked for them, now it&#8217;s working for you.  Funny old world, innit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eerie</title>
		<link>http://chris.quietlife.net/2006/03/15/muslim-reform/#comment-50305</link>
		<dc:creator>eerie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 18:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.quietlife.net/2006/03/15/muslim-reform/#comment-50305</guid>
		<description>No. If nobody pays attention to the thoughtful entries, I write something flippant to encourage debate and hopefully clear up some popular misconceptions. Why do you think I'm here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. If nobody pays attention to the thoughtful entries, I write something flippant to encourage debate and hopefully clear up some popular misconceptions. Why do you think I&#8217;m here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t. rev</title>
		<link>http://chris.quietlife.net/2006/03/15/muslim-reform/#comment-50304</link>
		<dc:creator>t. rev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.quietlife.net/2006/03/15/muslim-reform/#comment-50304</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;In fact she is not under any death sentence. No whackjob Islamic scholar has issued a fatwa calling for her death. Or Irshad Manji’s death, for that matter.&lt;/em&gt;

You're right.  I was reacting to the statement "&lt;em&gt;If you're lucky, some wacko will release a fatwa that demands you be stoned, beheaded or strung up in some elaborate medieval way.&lt;/em&gt;" and overextended the point.  My mistake.

&lt;em&gt;Of course, as we have seen with Rushdie, apostasy fatwas issued by loony takfirists make for great publicity in the Western media. Quite useful if you’re publishing a book.&lt;/em&gt;

...and on the other hand, it's still an obnoxious statement.  Tell the translators who've been murdered what a boost it was for &lt;em&gt;their&lt;/em&gt; careers.

&lt;em&gt;We’ve written “seriously” about the topic, but oddly nobody notices these entries.&lt;/em&gt;

So if you can't beat 'em, join 'em?  I guess it's working for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>In fact she is not under any death sentence. No whackjob Islamic scholar has issued a fatwa calling for her death. Or Irshad Manji’s death, for that matter.</em></p>
<p>You&#8217;re right.  I was reacting to the statement &#8220;<em>If you&#8217;re lucky, some wacko will release a fatwa that demands you be stoned, beheaded or strung up in some elaborate medieval way.</em>&#8221; and overextended the point.  My mistake.</p>
<p><em>Of course, as we have seen with Rushdie, apostasy fatwas issued by loony takfirists make for great publicity in the Western media. Quite useful if you’re publishing a book.</em></p>
<p>&#8230;and on the other hand, it&#8217;s still an obnoxious statement.  Tell the translators who&#8217;ve been murdered what a boost it was for <em>their</em> careers.</p>
<p><em>We’ve written “seriously” about the topic, but oddly nobody notices these entries.</em></p>
<p>So if you can&#8217;t beat &#8216;em, join &#8216;em?  I guess it&#8217;s working for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eerie</title>
		<link>http://chris.quietlife.net/2006/03/15/muslim-reform/#comment-50298</link>
		<dc:creator>eerie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.quietlife.net/2006/03/15/muslim-reform/#comment-50298</guid>
		<description>In fact she is not under any death sentence. No whackjob Islamic scholar has issued a fatwa calling for her death. Or Irshad Manji's death, for that matter. Of course, as we have seen with Rushdie, apostasy fatwas issued by loony takfirists make for great publicity in the Western media. Quite useful if you're publishing a book.

Note this line from the NYT (already hyping the death sentence angle):

&lt;i&gt;Dr. Sultan said she took those words as a formal fatwa, a religious condemnation.&lt;/i&gt;

In fact, a fatwa is simply a formal legal ruling that can be about anything from plucking eyebrows to divorce. It's also interesting that she paints dismissive comments from a TV debate as a "fatwa". Pretty smart, since Westerners automatically assume fatwa = death.

Celebrities always get death threats, nothing new. Wafa's just getting 15 mins of fame by bluntly insulting a billion people and making Western Islamphobes feel comfortable about their prejudices. Whether she portrays herself as a critic or a reformer is essentially irrelevant because her rhetoric will not result in any serious reflection on the part of average Muslims.

We've written "seriously" about the topic, but oddly nobody notices these entries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact she is not under any death sentence. No whackjob Islamic scholar has issued a fatwa calling for her death. Or Irshad Manji&#8217;s death, for that matter. Of course, as we have seen with Rushdie, apostasy fatwas issued by loony takfirists make for great publicity in the Western media. Quite useful if you&#8217;re publishing a book.</p>
<p>Note this line from the NYT (already hyping the death sentence angle):</p>
<p><i>Dr. Sultan said she took those words as a formal fatwa, a religious condemnation.</i></p>
<p>In fact, a fatwa is simply a formal legal ruling that can be about anything from plucking eyebrows to divorce. It&#8217;s also interesting that she paints dismissive comments from a TV debate as a &#8220;fatwa&#8221;. Pretty smart, since Westerners automatically assume fatwa = death.</p>
<p>Celebrities always get death threats, nothing new. Wafa&#8217;s just getting 15 mins of fame by bluntly insulting a billion people and making Western Islamphobes feel comfortable about their prejudices. Whether she portrays herself as a critic or a reformer is essentially irrelevant because her rhetoric will not result in any serious reflection on the part of average Muslims.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve written &#8220;seriously&#8221; about the topic, but oddly nobody notices these entries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://chris.quietlife.net/2006/03/15/muslim-reform/#comment-50253</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.quietlife.net/2006/03/15/muslim-reform/#comment-50253</guid>
		<description>I'd agree with that..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d agree with that..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t. rev</title>
		<link>http://chris.quietlife.net/2006/03/15/muslim-reform/#comment-50246</link>
		<dc:creator>t. rev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.quietlife.net/2006/03/15/muslim-reform/#comment-50246</guid>
		<description>Crooning "Oh, oh, I'm under a death sentence, oh, oh, they're coming to chop off my head, oooooh I'm so scaaaared" is lame snotty mockery when the target of your mockery actually is under a death sentence and people actually are getting killed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crooning &#8220;Oh, oh, I&#8217;m under a death sentence, oh, oh, they&#8217;re coming to chop off my head, oooooh I&#8217;m so scaaaared&#8221; is lame snotty mockery when the target of your mockery actually is under a death sentence and people actually are getting killed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
